Although they look very similar, the miniature husky and the Alaskan klee kai are classified as two different dog types. Even though they are both types of huskies, they are bred differently and have different temperaments. Both breeds are rare but gaining popularity as companion-sized huskies better suited to families with smaller homes. How the Miniature Husky is Bred Bree Normandin was the first to breed miniature huskies in the s. She began by selectively breeding Siberian huskies to achieve an even cuter, more compact size. Standard huskies that were exceptionally small were mated to propagate their "little gene" and pass it on to their tiny pups.
You are here: October 15, Welcome to the complete guide to the Miniature Husky! This miniature dog is attractive to many. The variation shares the dignified appearance and loyal, outgoing temperament of the Siberian. This article will answer questions like:
Er… no. It is actually impossible for a Teacup Husky to exist! Teacup breeds are miniature-sized dogs that are bred for the novelty of their small size, as opposed to health reasons. Breeders have experienced great difficulty in breeding the Siberian Husky down to the standard size of a Teacup dog.
There are two closely-related breeds to Huskies that are keeping the adult dog size small whilst still keeping most of the same appearance and temperament of a Husky. Miniature Siberian Huskies Sometimes called a mini husky, or miniature husky, but not to be confused with the Alaskan Klee Kai see below , the Miniature Siberian Husky is in essence, just a small husky! The American Kennel Club doesn't recognise Mini Siberian Huskies as a distinct breed, but rather a smaller sized variant of the standard Siberian Husky. They share the same colors, behaviors, and other traits of their bigger cousins. They have an energetic and independent temperament , shed their coat yearly , and are prone to the same hip and eye issues that affect the Siberian Husky.
Being part of a group where there is a belief in the same thing makes for an effective social collective. I think humanity in general has the desperate need to be part of a social/cultural group and the cost of doing this is quite high. So out of this comes the need to protect that investment, which means sometimes being ruthless in promoting it.